More Source Comparisons

I also visited my local audio dealer Addicted to Audio in Melbourne to compare the R6P2 with several of their audio players. I used the UM MEST MKIII IEMs for these comparisons, playing my favourite Yello track “Drive/Driven” through Apple Music, with all DAPs set to their highest gain level.

 

FiiO M15s (USD $999)

The M15s’ background hiss is immediately noticeable, in stark contrast to the R6P2’s black background. The M15s has a much flatter, less dynamic tonality, which feels more smoothed out and almost reminds me of the stereotypical R2R sound which I don’t especially care for.

Bass on the M15s is also fairly disappointing, and I’m noticing much more treble prominence on the R6P2 which may be a good or bad thing depending on your preference. To my ears the M15s softens & rounds the attack on notes too much, and also projects a soundstage that feels artificially stretched, where instruments are positioned in front of me a great distance away rather than wrapped around my head.

The M15s could be useful for dulling down an overly-aggressive or excessively bright IEM, but I much prefer the R6P2 for my taste.

 

Astell & Kern SE300 (USD $1899)

The SE300 features a much smoother, more refined R2R tonality than the R6P2, with a more liquid midrange that flows smoothly and imparts a greater feeling of analogue refinement.

Sonically the R6P2 feels brighter and more V-shaped, whereas the SE300 is warmer, smoother and in this particular case does an excellent job of balancing out MEST MKIII’s V-shaped’s presentation.

Other than a slightly deeper stage however, I don’t feel like the SE300 is performing to a higher technical level, though it does resolve similar amounts of information without having to rely quite so much on treble prominence to do it. I definitely prefer the SE300’s build quality and volume wheel, but can imagine many people appreciating the R6P2’s slightly more exciting presentation.

 

Astell & Kern SP3000 (USD $3699)

At 493 grams the SP3000 feels substantially heavier, which along with its’ more vibrant screen helps impart a more premium feel.

The SP3000 is tuned more politely, with a much greater sense of refinement. Midrange texture and tonality is smoother, treble feels less harsh, and imaging is perhaps the best I’ve heard from any player on the market with notes popping out from an inky black background.

The SP3000’s soundstage feels similarly wide, but is undoubtedly deeper, though I find its’ dynamics a tad muted which to me suggests its’ headphone amplifier may be lacking. It makes the R6P2 sound unrefined by comparison, though I’m not sure the differences between them are enough to justify the price gap, nor do I suspect everyone would prefer the SP3000’s more polite presentation.

 

Page 1 – Introduction, Tech Specs & Battery Life, Ergonomics & Usability
Page 2 – Sound Performance & Technical Performance
Page 3 – Source Comparisons
Page 4 – More Source Comparisons
Page 5 – Conclusion